On this page

Based on blitzzmarketing.com, registry and domain records and third-party review sites. Last checked October 22, 2026. Not related to other companies named Blitz Marketing.

Agency review
#5 of 5 in our rankings

Blitzz Marketing Review (2026)

The cheapest HARO packages we found, from a Canadian healthcare-marketing agency for which journalist outreach is one service among many. Low prices and named platforms are offset by a half-finished website and no verifiable placements.

Last checked October 22, 2026 · Reviewed by the Editorial Team · Sources

Blitzz Marketing logo
6.3
/ 10
Pricing and terms
7.5
Process and platforms
7.0
Placement evidence
5.5
Transparency and reputation
5.0
Support and reporting
6.5
Starting price
$600 for 5 links
DR range
DR 45–90 by plan (claimed)
Turnaround
1–4 months by plan
Founded
2025 · Mississauga, Canada

Overview

Blitzz Marketing, legally Clarient Solutions Inc., is a generalist agency in Mississauga, Ontario that leans towards healthcare and med-spa clients, with around 45 medical specialty pages, plus SEO, paid ads, social, web design and AI automation. HARO link building is a single service page, published in September 2025 under the digital PR heading. The domain was registered in May 2025; the owner is identified only as “Kavitha A.” and the site positions itself as a New York agency although the only address is in Mississauga.

What they sell

  • Starter: $600 for 5 links, DR 50–75, one to two months.
  • Exclusive: $1,000 for 10 links, DR 50–80, one to three months.
  • Supreme: $1,400 for 15 links, DR 45–90, three to four months.

Links below DR 40 are described as complimentary, and the agency says you pay only when links are delivered. A separate, unlinked pricing page sells “guaranteed placement” PR plans from $199 to $999 a month, which read like paid placements rather than earned coverage.

Pricing and terms

At roughly $93–$120 per link this is far below the $220–$520 that most HARO-style vendors charge, which is either a bargain or a warning sign. Nothing on the site resolves which: there is no refund policy, no replacement policy, no do-follow commitment, no statement of currency and no definition of what counts as a delivered “link”. The terms-of-service page is an unedited template that still reads “State of [Your State]” and misspells the agency’s own domain.

Process and platforms

The agency says it writes the pitches and monitors HARO, Source of Sources, Help a B2B Writer, Qwoted, Featured, Muck Rack, Prowly, Cision One and X. That is the longest platform list of any agency we reviewed, and the owner does have a live Qwoted source profile and was quoted in a Connectively roundup in April 2025, which supports at least part of the claim. Reporting is per placement with DR and traffic figures.

Placement evidence

The site claims “900+ featured backlinks”, “50+ clients” and a “99% success” rate, and shows a logo strip including BBC, Yahoo, Healthline and Kiplinger. There are no placement URLs, no case studies and no named clients, so none of it can be checked.

Reputation and trust signals

No reviews exist on Trustpilot, Clutch, G2, DesignRush, Google or Reddit as of October 22, 2026. The About, Team, Careers and Success pages still carry the demo copy of the WordPress theme the site was built with, including a fictional agency history, a fictional team and “5,000+ reviews”. The site’s structured data and footers identify the organisation as helpMDs, a sister brand whose own domain has since become a medical-billing site. There is a real address, real phone numbers and a press release, and ScamAdviser rates the domain as likely safe with low traffic.

Support and reporting

Month-to-month terms, phone and email contact, and per-placement reports. No dashboard or account-manager promise is made.

Verdict

Blitzz Marketing may suit a healthcare or local brand that wants to try journalist-request links for a few hundred dollars and can tolerate uncertainty. For anyone else, the missing terms, the template-filled website and the absence of a single verifiable placement outweigh the low price. If you do test it, pay for the smallest package, ask for live placement URLs from a previous client first, and confirm in writing that only do-follow links from the promised DR range will be billed.

Pros

Cons

Score breakdown

Weights: pricing and terms 25%, process and platforms 20%, placement evidence 25%, transparency and reputation 20%, support and reporting 10%.

Pricing and terms
7.5
Process and platforms
7.0
Placement evidence
5.5
Transparency and reputation
5.0
Support and reporting
6.5
Weighted total
6.3 / 10
Keep comparing

The other agencies we reviewed

Outreaching.io logo
8.5
/ 10

SaaS and B2B brands that want HARO plus digital PR

HARO Link Building logo
8.2
/ 10

Steady editorial links at a flat per-link price

LinkBuilder.io logo
7.8
/ 10

Bigger budgets that want a fully managed link programme

HARO Links Builder logo
7.2
/ 10

Startups testing HARO on a small budget

Have evidence that changes this review?

Agencies and clients can send placements, terms or corrections. We verify what we receive and update the review with a new date.